What is a common outcome if both fencers commit an infraction at the same time?

A simultaneous hit may be awarded based on right of way, which is the correct outcome when both fencers commit an infraction simultaneously. In fencing, the concept of right of way is crucial for determining which fencer has priority during an action. When both fencers make an infraction at the same time—such as simultaneously hitting each other—it's essential to apply the right of way rules to see if one fencer has priority over the other.

If the actions are indeed simultaneous and no clear priority can be established, the referee may award a point to one fencer based on which fencer had the right of way or should it be determined that neither gained priority, both fencers may receive simultaneous hits. This outcome recognizes the realities of competitive fencing, where both fencers can be equally responsible for the actions leading to an infraction.

In other scenarios, calling a point for one fencer without applying the right of way would be improper unless there is a clear violation or priority established. A re-fight is generally not conducted to determine the winner unless the bout is halted for other significant reasons not related to simultaneous infractions. Lastly, while penalties may be given for infractions, the normal outcome when both fencers infringe at the same time