What does the current rule regarding non-combativity NOT include?

The correct choice pertains to the definition of non-combativity in fencing rules, which focus on ensuring that fencers remain actively engaged in the bout. The inclusion of specific criteria to define inactivity is crucial for maintaining the flow of the match.

When evaluating the correct answer, it is important to understand that the rule regarding non-combativity does not specify a situation with no blade contact for more than 15 seconds. This differentiation is significant because non-combativity rules primarily focus on the actions of the fencers and their engagement in offensive or defensive strategies rather than merely the absence of blade contact.

In fencing, non-combativity is typically indicated by measures such as a stipulated period of inactivity or failure to initiate an attack. As for continuous attacks, while they do contribute to combativeness, the rule set does allow for tactical pauses as long as alternate actions are followed.

The other criteria likely refer to established norms in fencing where inactivity is defined, such as the maximum allowed inactivity time indicating potential non-combativity in a more structured context. Thus, understanding these nuanced rules helps reinforce the importance of engagement and maintaining the dynamic nature of fencing.