In a situation where both fencers exhibit non-combativity in a direct elimination match, what is the Referee's next step?

In a situation where both fencers demonstrate non-combativity during a direct elimination match, the referee's next step is to advance to a final minute and determine priority. This procedure allows the match to continue with a chance for one fencer to assert their dominance and score, thereby encouraging active engagement.

The ruling stems from the concept that combativeness is essential in fencing, and if both fencers fail to engage, the final minute serves as a structured way to resolve the issue. During this time, the referee may determine which fencer is more engaged or aggressive in their approach, thus helping to maintain the spirit of the competition and facilitate a fair outcome.

Ending the bout immediately would be premature, as it does not allow for an opportunity to salvage the match. Issuing penalties to both fencers might not be warranted if there is a structured way to address the non-combativity, and calling for a rematch would be an extreme measure when a simple resolution through the final minute can be implemented. This structured approach maintains competitive integrity while providing a means to reward active fencing.