In a direct elimination bout where video replay is in use, if Fencer X previously requested video review two times, what should happen when they request a video review for a third time?

The correct procedure when a fencer requests a video review for the third time during a direct elimination bout, despite having previously requested it two times, is to review the action using the video replay system. In fencing, the use of video review is meant to ensure fairness and accuracy in officiating by allowing referees to reassess contentious calls. Each request for video review is treated with impartiality to ensure that all the actions are thoroughly evaluated irrespective of the number of previous requests made by a fencer.

By reviewing the action, the referee reinforces the integrity of the match and maintains the opportunity for each fencer to clarify points of contention in their bouts, thereby enhancing the quality of the sport overall. It shows the importance of allowing fencers the right to question decisions made during competition, which is a key aspect of managing fencing matches.

In this scenario, the other choices introduce limitations or unnecessary protocols that are not consistent with fair officiating practices. Such restrictions could undermine the use of video review as a vital tool for ensuring accurate outcomes in matches. Therefore, the process must prioritize the review of the action at hand, promoting a fair competition.